Manaia Tamehana — Editor
Anahera Waititi — Writer & researcher
What the byline means on a review
A review’s date records the source-checking edition, not a promise that the operator’s terms cannot change later. The source list shows the pages used and the review notes identify missing or conflicting information. A source labelled blocked is a record of a gap, not evidence supporting a claim.
The named author is accountable for how the sources were read and presented. It is not a claim that a writer has personally deposited, played or withdrawn at every operator: where a figure comes from operator terms or a secondary record, the review says so.
Our editorial standard
Each writer is accountable for the claims under their name. We do not describe documentary comparisons as hands-on reviews, and we do not decorate a page with a professional title we cannot evidence. If a reviewer ever performs a real payment test, it will be documented with the date, account eligibility, method, currency, requested amount and start and finish points — and labelled as such.
Until then, every assessment links its sources and identifies the research edition. Where a source is blocked, stale or contradictory, the review explains the limit instead of smoothing it over.
Corrections and conflicts of interest
Commercial lineup position and research findings are different things. A brand can appear first in a supplied list while having substantial unanswered questions. We preserve that distinction and explain it in our commercial disclosure.
For a correction, identify the page, the specific claim and a current primary source. Do not send identification documents or gambling-account credentials. The contact page explains the information needed for an editorial report.

